Returning back to the Anthropic compiler attempt: one of the steps that the agent failed was the one that was more strongly related to the idea of memorization of what is in the pretraining set: the assembler. With extensive documentation, I can’t see any way Claude Code (and, even more, GPT5.3-codex, which is in my experience, for complex stuff, more capable) could fail at producing a working assembler, since it is quite a mechanical process. This is, I think, in contradiction with the idea that LLMs are memorizing the whole training set and uncompress what they have seen. LLMs can memorize certain over-represented documents and code, but while they can extract such verbatim parts of the code if prompted to do so, they don’t have a copy of everything they saw during the training set, nor they spontaneously emit copies of already seen code, in their normal operation. We mostly ask LLMs to create work that requires assembling different knowledge they possess, and the result is normally something that uses known techniques and patterns, but that is new code, not constituting a copy of some pre-existing code.
Ранее синоптик сообщила, что в марте Москва может превратиться в Венецию из-за больших запасов влаги в снежном покрове.
。搜狗输入法2026对此有专业解读
旅行中，一些外国人成为中国新故事的讲述者。格里夫妇在重庆旅行期间，拍摄制作了多条短视频，既有李子坝奇特的“单轨穿楼”，也有错落有致的立交桥，展现了山城的现代风貌。
辨认应当制作辨认笔录，由人民警察和辨认人签名、盖章或者按指印。
Что думаешь? Оцени!